Study
Enformer Recognizes cis-Regulated Genes by Prediction Magnitude but Fails to Predict Effect Direction: A Magnitude–Direction Dissociation in Individual-Level Expression Prediction
View full titleShow less
We cross-reference Enformer's individual-level per-gene Pearson R (Sasse et al.
Abstract
We cross-reference Enformer's individual-level per-gene Pearson R (Sasse et al. 2023, Nature Genetics, ROSMAP cohort n=839) with GTEx v8 Brain Cortex eGenes (n=9,082) across 6,808 genes, and report a fundamental dissociation: prediction magnitude (|R|) monotonically predicts cis-eQTL gene identity (eGene rate 31.6% → 82.5%; |R| model AIC=8274 vs R+R² AIC=8378, ΔAIC=104), but prediction direction for eGenes is near-random (54.0% correct; max D10=62.5%). Direction errors are irreversible by fine-tuning on ROSMAP (Mann–Whitney p≈10⁻¹⁰⁰), yet PrediXcan recovers correct direction for R<0 eGenes (PrediXcanR=0.295), consistent with the hypothesis that Enformer's non-brain ENCODE training corpus lacks the brain-specific regulatory programs needed to correctly orient directional effects.
This page presents preserved, source-backed released materials.
Citation
Cite the scholarly record and pinned analysis source.
Scholarly publication
DongKoo Lee. Enformer Recognizes cis-Regulated Genes by Prediction Magnitude but Fails to Predict Effect Direction: A Magnitude–Direction Dissociation in Individual-Level Expression Prediction. 10.5281/zenodo.20754855.
Pinned analysis source
https://github.com/mostafavilabuw/EnformerAssessment, commit afac6658d57bfe6e2c1f17d9a96e3593843000a2.