Study

Enformer Recognizes cis-Regulated Genes by Prediction Magnitude but Fails to Predict Effect Direction: A Magnitude–Direction Dissociation in Individual-Level Expression Prediction

View full titleShow less

We cross-reference Enformer's individual-level per-gene Pearson R (Sasse et al.

Abstract

We cross-reference Enformer's individual-level per-gene Pearson R (Sasse et al. 2023, Nature Genetics, ROSMAP cohort n=839) with GTEx v8 Brain Cortex eGenes (n=9,082) across 6,808 genes, and report a fundamental dissociation: prediction magnitude (|R|) monotonically predicts cis-eQTL gene identity (eGene rate 31.6% → 82.5%; |R| model AIC=8274 vs R+R² AIC=8378, ΔAIC=104), but prediction direction for eGenes is near-random (54.0% correct; max D10=62.5%). Direction errors are irreversible by fine-tuning on ROSMAP (Mann–Whitney p≈10⁻¹⁰⁰), yet PrediXcan recovers correct direction for R<0 eGenes (PrediXcanR=0.295), consistent with the hypothesis that Enformer's non-brain ENCODE training corpus lacks the brain-specific regulatory programs needed to correctly orient directional effects.

This page presents preserved, source-backed released materials.
Evidence does not infer results absent from the immutable sources.
Scientific commitafac6658d57b
Result tables5
CoverageComplete
LicenseMIT License

Deterministic extraction method

No generative model selected, summarized, or transformed the results.

Evidence classified preserved repository files, parsed bounded structured tables, inferred column types, and selected registered components using versioned rules.